
Last week was about Legos and the importance of BOTH the details and big picture. This week is about Legos, evidence, and trust.
I am very methodical when I do my Lego builds. I sort out the pieces into containers and then gather the required pieces for the step before ever connecting anything. Sometimes, I can’t initially find the piece I’m looking for. When this happens, I immediately assume that I either missed it or I have done something to lose it vs. Lego not having the right pieces. I assume this, because I have COMPLETE faith and trust in Lego. I’ve built dozens of their kits over my lifetime. I can count on them to ALWAYS have the right pieces and the right instructions to build something amazing. As a result, I trust Lego and their process. I can’t say I feel the same way about Lego knock-off companies. I’ve built with them before, and there have been missing pieces, bad instructions, etc. Those other non-Lego companies have never given me a reason to trust them, but they’ve asked me to anyway.
What does this have to do with anything? There are a couple of parallels we can draw. First, we can look at people in our life. How many of them are trustworthy Lego vs. the untrustworthy knock-off competitors? When have you been Lego vs. the knock-off competitors? I know I’ve played both roles. What can we do to become even more trustworthy?
The other connection is around this idea of “You just need to give it a chance. You just need to trust the process.” I feel this is something that is often said in Corporate America when there is some organizational change or pivot. I’ve always found this interesting, because it puts the burden on me to buy into something that isn’t proven. My question is always, “Why should I trust the process?” I’m not saying we should all be cynical and doubt everything. I do think it’s fair to expect evidence for claims that are being made. “Why should I trust that process? What has the organization shown me that makes me believe it will all work out?” If you’re leading any kind of organizational change management, the burden is on YOU to establish the reasons why someone should buy in. I trust Lego and its process, because its actions have earned that trust over time. As you lead organizational change management, have you and/or your team earned that trust to “follow the process” over time?
The challenges: How can we become more trustworthy? If you’re leading organizational change, what are YOU doing to provide evidence for why someone should trust the process?
Have a jolly good day,
Andrew Embry
