
Last week was about making trade-offs in order to avoid burnout. This week is about enabling trade-offs.
The other day my boss did something that was very simple and very effective. I was on an email chain with my boss and someone else. My boss wrote something along the lines of, “You should connect with Andrew on this. Andrew will be wrapped up this week and next week on X.” It was a simple two sentences. It drove home that this was important. It also gave me air cover that he didn’t expect me to move on it right away. He was enabling me to make a trade-off to focus on X, and get to this at a later date. It was a simple two sentences that were powerful and appreciated. Have you ever had a leader give you air cover? How did it feel?
Let’s connect the dots. How often do you hear leaders talk about how we need to make trade-off decisions? I feel this is a constant talking point at most townhalls. Now, how often do leaders enable you to actually make trade-off decisions? How often do they proactively give you the air cover to not do all the things all the time at the same time? This is where things tend to fall apart. It’s easy to say the right things, and much harder to do the right things.
Something I’m trying to do a better job of is ensuring there is more comfort, clarity, and alignment around what can move slow in comparison. The conversation usually goes like this, “The top priorities are A, B, and C. I see you are also trying to move X, Y, and Z. If X, Y, and Z ever threaten A, B, and C, then I want you to know I’m okay with X, Y, and Z moving slower. I’m comfortable with you pausing that work and making that trade-off, so we can nail A, B, and C.” You can have conversations like this if you are officially in a leadership position and even if you are an individual contributor partnering with cross-functional teams.
The challenges: How are you giving your people air cover to make trade-off decisions?
Have a jolly good day,
Andrew Embry








