
Last week was about bags of rock and not assuming you’re a burden. This week is about decision making rights and intentional collaboration.
Technically, it is my wife’s garden. However, she did invite us all to collaborate in certain ways. She was very clear that she alone was going to decide how to design the space, which included creating the paths, setting up the rock, and deciding which structures go where. Outside of the creating the space, she invited us in to help populate the space. We had the opportunity to choose flowers, vegetables, colors, and other potential decorations. My contribution is this cool cat statue that hangs out in the corner 😉
Let’s connect this to decision making rights and intentional collaboration. Sometimes, when people think of collaboration, they assume this means that everyone has an equal part throughout every step of the decision-making process. Have you ever experienced this on a project? I have, A LOT. I’d argue that our culture of consensus leads to this as well. Approaching problems in a manner where there has to be 100% consensus is incredibly inefficient and slow. The fact is that not everyone has equal decision rights in any given situation. The fact is that everyone’s viewpoint and feedback should not be equal in every situation.
Notice what my wife did in our story this week. She was crystal clear that she was the decision maker on the garden design. This clarity let the kids and I know not to spend any time there. My wife was also very clear on where she wanted our input. As a result, we could focus our time and efforts in that area. While my kids and I may not have weighed in on every decision, we were still able to contribute in meaningful ways. We are still proud of our contributions.
The challenge: Will you take the time to outline who has the true decision making rights? Will you take the time to outline roles and responsibilities when you begin collaborating?
Have a jolly good day,
Andrew Embry
