
Last week was about a cooking competition and playing you role. This week is about cooking and leadership as it relates to style vs. competencies. Pretend Sam, Bob, and Susie invite you over for a cookout. They say that they can make hamburgers or hot dogs for you. You say that sounds great, but there’s a small catch. You are allergic to hot dogs. It’s nothing life threatening, but eating hot dogs kind of upsets your stomach, so it would be better if we ate hamburgers. They say that’s fine and they all agree to make hamburgers.
Bob serves you a classic burger with steak fries. Susie serves you a BBQ burger with onion rings You like both meals, but you give the edge to Susie, because you like that style better. Sam serve you hot dogs. You eat them out of politeness and eventually ask Sam why they didn’t serve burgers. Sam explains to you they are more comfortable making hot dogs, and can’t really make burgers. You go home and your stomach is a little upset. In this example, the expectation is that you will be served hamburgers. Which kind of hamburger you like best is a style preference. Either hamburger you choose fulfills your needs. Sam’s inability to cook hamburgers is a competency issue, which leads to Sam making hot dogs. Eating the hot dogs causes you to feel ill. In this situation, Sam needs to enhance their cooking skills.
So you’re probably wondering what this has to do with work. When it comes to leadership everyone has a different style. At the same time I’d argue that the best leaders I’ve seen demonstrate the same competencies. In the grand scheme of things, style isn’t as important as having the right skills, which is true for all roles. The reason why I bring up this point is that when it comes to leadership I believe that we are quick to label shortcomings as differences in styles as opposed to competencies that a leader needs to improve upon.
For example, creating an engaging team culture is a core part of being a leader. With that said, how many times have you heard something like, “Sam is really smart, talented, and gets stuff done. The people side of things just is not his style.”? I don’t know about you, but I’ve heard several kinds of variations of this about leaders who “don’t get the people side”. The thing is, this is NOT a style issue. It’s a competency issue. A style difference is saying, “Susie is high energy and builds team culture with infectious enthusiasm. Bob is quieter than Susie, so he builds teams through 1 on 1s and small meetings where he focuses on authenticity and sincerity.”
I’ve had both Susies and Bobs as bosses, and both create great cultures. They just happen to be doing it in different ways. You might have a style preference, but either way an engaging culture is being created. On the other hand, Sam isn’t creating a positive team culture. This is a lack of competency in a specific area. Sam either lacks the ability and/or the desire to build an engaging culture. Building an engaging culture is a big part of Sam’s job, so if they can’t do it then there is a problem because this will hinder team performance. If Sam can’t do it, they need to improve in this competency. At a cookout you could at least choose not to eat the food. At work, there’s no way to completely avoid leadership that isn’t up to snuff.
The challenge: We often believe we are better than we actually are, so the challenge is taking a second to honestly reflect on yourself as a leader. Where do you need to leverage your style? Where do you need to improve your competencies?
Have a jolly good day,
Andrew Embry








